Sabtu, 29 Oktober 2011

Why do we make women lie?


Inside Television 576
Publication Date: 10-28-11
By: Hubert O’Hearn

Why Women are Forced to Lie

Let me ask you something. Have you ever lied about your age? Answer that question honestly to yourself. Maybe you were the tall kid who was sent into the beer store at age 17 with enough flop sweat pouring down your face to water a golf course. Or maybe in a dateless and desperate time (there actually once was, briefly,  a game show called Dateless and Desperate) you snipped just a little off the top and sides of the old birth year while filling in that on-line profile.

Now here’s the tougher question. If you answered yes to the first - Why? Really now, why would you do that, other than to get beer or enlist early so you could go and kill Hitler? For any social reason, it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. You are you. You’re stuck with you. You can neither have more memories and experiences than what you’ve had, or less of either. You are the mental and physical composite of all that you have done or has been done to you.

And yet, millions of people allow a number to determine their worth. Birthdays are accompanied by quite specific sounds. At 5, it’s the high-pitched vibrating fart of a blow tickler. at 20, it’s the pop and fizz of a first bottle of decent champagne. At 40 it’s the beep beep beep of a dump truck backing into your driveway waiting to haul you off to the landfill along with three dented hubcaps, two priceless comic books your Mom accidentally tossed out, and a CD of Rick Astley’s Greatest Hit. Yes indeed, you are now a package of meat with a $2.00 Off coupon slapped across your face. And I do mean slapped.

I hope you’ve had a decent chuckle or two so far. Our duty here is to entertain as well as inform. There is however a quite serious point to all this. For you, hitting 40 means that the 22 year olds no longer find you attractive. (Guess what? They weren’t all hot and bothered when you were 26 either. Sorry to break it to you like this in public.) For women, particularly women who are actresses, 40 is the date of execution for their careers.

Perhaps you think I’m exaggerating. Fair enough; I’ve been known to pucker up to Blarney once or twice in my life. So let’s do a quick test. Think about movies and TV. How many women can you think of with current leading or major supporting roles who are in their 20s and 30s? Don’t start writing them down, we haven’t got all day here. Now how many can you name of similar working status over the age of 40? Besides Helen Mirren. Okay, besides Helen Mirren and Judi Dench. Besides Helen Mirren, Judi Dench , Meryl Streep and that other one. You know who I mean. She was in the thing that was out last year. You know. That show. we all watched it. everybody loved it until it was canceled. How old’s Kate Winslet now? (She’s 36. the clock is ticking.)

There is a lawsuit working its way through the courts in the U.S. right now. Several actresses have banded together to file a  class action suit against the Google-owned imdb.com - the Internet Movie Database. They each had individually requested that imdb not list their dates of birth because being known as plus 40 in age (although curiously not in breast size) meant that the work dried up.

To get the real inside story I asked my friend Lydia Cornell for her take on the subject. The former star of Too Close for Comfort,  Curb Your Enthusiasm and several new films is the perfect industry informant and friend: honest, smart, funny and willing to be quoted. Her sharp and witty blog can be found at http://LydiaCornell.com .

So what is the truth about over-40 actresses Lydia? "George Clooney and Michelle Pfeiffer are the same age, but on magazine covers, HE gets to have crows' feet and gray hair while she has every line air-brushed out of her face. And she's still not working.” Ouch.

George Clooney...literally acting his age



Let me toss some names at you of some very beautiful, very talented women: Michelle Pfeiffer, Jessica Lange, Terri Garr, Theresa Russell, Debra Winger. There’s five off the top of my head. Now you tell me when the last time was you saw any of them on a big or small screen.

Much more to be said on this subject on another day. For now though the prosecution rests, even if the persecution continues. Be seeing you.

Fungsi Labels Pada Blogspot




Melanjutkan Postingan Terdahulu Mengenai Fungsi-Fungsi Menu Setting Blogspot kali ini Blogspot Pemula membuat artikel tentang Fungsi Labels Pada Blogspot. 



Apa sih gunanya labels? Secara singkat labels itu adalah kategori yang befungsi untuk mengelompokkan artikel atau postingan yang berkaitan.

Supaya pengunjung bisa lebih mudah untuk menemukan artikel yang ingin dicari. labels juga bisa

Jumat, 28 Oktober 2011

Fungsi-Fungsi Menu Setting Blogspot




Kali ini Blogspot Pemula akan membahas Fungsi-Fungsi Menu Setting Blog. Kadangkala kita akan kebingungan dengan fungsi-fungsi yang tersedia pada blogger. 



Apabila diatur dengan baik kita bisa mengoptimalkan blog kita dengan maksimal, padahal Blogspot Pemula kedodoran ya. Maklum Posting sesempatnya aja.

Pada postingan kali ini kami akan memberi sedikit penjelasan mengenai Fungsi-Fungsi Menu

Minggu, 23 Oktober 2011

Cara Mendaftarkan Blog Ke Feedburner




Cara Mendaftarkan Blog Ke Feedburner. Feedburner adalah suatu jasa layanan untuk mempublikasikan suatu blog atau web dengan cara menyebarluaskan suatu content dan rss feed suatu blog / web.



Layanan feedburner ini akan membantu mempromosikan isi suatu blog atau web sehingga bisa mendapatkan traffic baik suatu blog atau website. 



FeedBurner Feed ikut andil dalam memperoleh kualitas

DRAKE-THE REAL HER (FEAT LIL'WAYNE) LYRICS AN FREE GRAB






GRAB 4 FREE>>>>>>>>>>>



REAL STEEL 2011 WATCH ONLINE





  • UK Cinema Release Date: 14/10/2011
  • Certificate: 12A
  • Genre: Action / Adventure / Drama / Sci-Fi
  • Run Time: 126
  • Director: 
    Shawn Levy
  • Cast: 
    Hugh Jackman, Evangeline Lilly, Kevin Durand,Anthony Mackie, Hope Davis

Real Steel stars Hugh Jackman as Charlie Kenton, a washed–up fighter who lost his chance at a title when 2000–pound, 8–foot–tall steel robots took over the ring. Now nothing but a small–time promoter, Charlie earns just enough money piecing together low–end bots from scrap metal to get from one underground boxing venue to the next. When Charlie hits rock bottom, he reluctantly teams up with his estranged son Max (Dakota Goyo) to build and train a championship contender. As the stakes in the brutal, no–holds–barred arena are raised, Charlie and Max, against all odds, get one last shot at a comeback.







IF THE STREAMING VIDEO STOPS PLAYING PLEASE PLAY IT FROM THE SECOND SERVER
STARTING FROM  THE SAME TIME 












Sabtu, 22 Oktober 2011

Occupy Part 5: What the Movement can Learn from Mao Zedong



Politics for Joe
October 23, 2011
By: Hubert O’Hearn
For: Lake Superior News

The Occupy Movement Part 5:

What The Movement Can Learn from Mao Zedong

If you give me credit for nothing else (which would be a shrewd decision on your part), you have to admit that’s a pretty catchy headline. Oh it’s intentionally misleading with only a  kernel or truth to it, but it got you reading this far, so it therefore has proven the utility of its existence. I do admit to a certain pleasurable fantasy of Twitter or Facebook or Reddit readers running across the eight words above and yelling out, “I told you Margaret! Them Occupiers is a bunch of commies!” (pause) “Where’s our little red books from back when we was students?”

Let’s leave the amusing sitcom fantasies aside however, and deal with the reality of the Occupy Movement. It’s doing quite nicely as of this writing. The tent villages are still intact; the police attacks seem to have eased back, and Occupy has passed from ‘ignorable novelty news item’ to a seemingly fixed demographic on the political map. I know that this is deniable, and any Pentagon spokesman or White House Press Secretary would react in shock worthy of Claude Rains if faced with the hypothesis, but I would be willing to bet large and give good odds that the American pull-out of all troops from Iraq by the end of the year is a direct reaction by Barack Obama to Occupy.

Make no mistake, Occupy is pretty much as pissed off with the Democrats as it is the Republicans. This is the fascinating overlap with the Tea Party in terms of attitude and a sense that the System, the grand old military-industrial complex Eisenhower defined and warned against near the end of his Presidency, is both broke and broken. The Tea Party/Occupy is composed of nominal Republicans/Democrats who think the mainstream of their party is spineless and corrupt.

So Obama has had to give them something. He couldn’t give Occupy financial reform even if he wanted to, which I’m not so sure he does. He thinks he needs the Wall Street money for his re-election - he actually doesn’t, by the way. If Barack Obama stood up tomorrow and announced that the amount of money spent on elections was an absolute corrupting vulgarity. He therefore states for the record that his campaign, starting tomorrow, will not air a single paid TV commercial or billboard. The campaign will disperse to charity all funds already raised in excess of normal operations: offices where people can gather and talk about solutions. He, Barack Obama would otherwise trust the much-maligned media to do an honest and balanced job of reporting his positions to the American people.

He would sweep to an FDR-size landslide re-election.



FDR with advice for Obama...






Of course he won’t do that. That would require a willing acceptance of risk and if there is one thing we have learned about Obama is is that Hilary Clinton was right. He talks a very good game but he is conservative almost to the point of paralysis.

So give the people Iraq. It will save the Treasury a hell of a lot of money. My only surprise is that Afghanistan didn’t go first, unless Afghanistan is being strengthened to keep troops in the region close to Pakistan and Iran. We have not seen the end of regional wars - they may just be shifting their battlegrounds to the East.

All of which puts Occupy in the U.S. in a very interesting position. I will talk about Canada in a moment, but as always, American politics are for grown-ups. As well, this may be the last time America will ever actually lead on a political movement. Watching the U.S. in 2011 must be how it felt to watch Britain in 1946. The song is over, but nobody’s told the singer.

I think Occupy may be about to make a massive mistake. I’m not sure of this - it’s a 55/45 proposition to me. So I’ll put my arguments out and let you make your own mind up.

It seems that there is a convention being planned for, in effect, the first Occupy Plenary Sessions in July of 2012. It will of course be democratically pure. Each individual Occupy group would send one delegate to put together a platform and/or list of demands that would be put forward to each candidate. A full endorsement of Occupy’s policy by the candidate would be required to receive Occupy’s endorsement of the candidate.

Here are my two problems with that idea. One, politicians lie. Two, it’s boring. If it is one thing of many that Occupy does, I have no problem with it. Every trade association, professional association, labour union, right-to life, pro-choice, etc. etc. group already does candidate surveys, which ultimately is what we’re talking about.

No, that would be a trap. It would prove divisive and would make Occupy too inward-looking rather than engaging in a conversation with the greater community. Occupy needs to communicate. It needs to engage. It needs to us its most charming quality - that it listens politely yet speaks firmly - to educate.

So this is why I mentioned Mao Zedong. This must be seen as a Long March in order to succeed. Retreat in order to advance. Accumulate a great enough force then the victory, when it comes, will be swift. Occupy must not make its focus the 2012 elections. They will prove important, but they are not the entire game either.

Here is where Canada and all the other countries with Occupy chapters come in. Build from the ground. Retail politics. Congressmen, Senators, MP’s in Canada or the UK, who happen to really get on board with Occupy are great, but view them as a bonus. Instead, get Occupy members elected onto school boards, town councils, credit union boards, union locals - the true grass roots.

In that way, if the Democrats cannot be reformed - or in Canada the NDP or Greens strengthened - if the situation is such that Occupy needs to rise as  a Social Democratic Party - then it will have actual practiced candidates to take forward to higher levels. Build the team, then take Capitol Hill or Parliament Hill.

This is nominally the end of my Occupy Series. My intention however is to keep writing about it. I haven’t yet got to the interviews I have lined up. So look for more. And please, please feel free to forward to me your thoughts, comments and questions. I’[ll get to them.

Be seeing you.