Rabu, 04 Mei 2011

Inside Television: Won't Get Fooled Again

Inside Television 552


Publication date: 5-6-11

By: Hubert O’Hearn





I was glad to have run the three-part Actress series that concluded last week for a couple of reasons. One, it always feel good to assist in getting over a local artist; and second you were spared three weeks of analysis of the election campaign. You may send appropriate thank you gifts care of this paper. Unmarked bills will do just fine.



Now that it is all over and we have once more realized the prescience of Pete Townshend when he ended Won’t Get Fooled Again with the pessimistic couplet ‘meet the new boss/same as the old boss’ there are elements of the media campaign that bear examination. So let’s have a look at these Portraits at the Exhibition.



The Telling Moment: The most important moment of this entire campaign was seen by only a handful of the readers of this column. During the French-language debate, NDP leader Jack Layton took the tar baby of constitutional negotiations with Quebec, bounced it on his knee and said (metaphorically obviously) let’s play.



This did two things almost simultaneously. One, a lethargic Bloc Quebecois campaign was kicked to the curb as Quebeckers saw a national party endorsing their interests and ran to it. The resultant and inevitably referred to ‘surge’ (I kept looking for General David Petraeus riding in a convoy with Layton) in the polls in turn boosted NDP fortunes across the rest of the country.



The Fawlty Towers Issue: Remember that episode of Fawlty Towers where Basil hits his head and keeps cautioning Manuel and Polly, ‘Don’t mention the war!’ to a group of German tourists. Outside of Layton flatly stating that an NDP government would bring the troops home from Afghanistan promptly and with dispatch, the whole question of Canada’s defence policies went ignored. This might have been an opportunity for the Liberals to have made a strong case for how they would govern differently than the Conservatives - they had invented Pearsonian peacekeeping after all - but for one little problem.



You Get What You Pay For: The Liberals had anointed Michael Ignatieff as leader without a leadership convention because they saw him as a second Pierre Trudeau. Ignatieff had a PhD., had appeared on television frequently and the examination stopped there. So, one reasonably expected that their campaign would feature the illuminating ideas of Michael Ignatieff. Where were they?



Well, they were well-hidden and for good reason. Perhaps the best thing Jean Chretien did was keep Canada out of the Iraq war. Ignatieff endorsed the war, to the point of contracting himself out to the U.S. Defense Department as a consultant. Worse yet, he takes a benign neglect stance towards the torture of political prisoners. These tend to be ideas not endorsed by the majority of Canadian voters. I suspect, without knowing it, that both the NDP and Conservatives had attack ads on these positions at the ready if the Liberal campaign had gained any traction.



Nixon’s The One: Richard Nixon won a crushing victory over George McGovern in 1972 despite leading a government cloaked in secrecy and sleazeball tactics against its opponents. Before anyone thinks I have my dates mixed up, while it is true that the full Watergate scandal would not break open until after the election, the attempted repression of the Pentagon Papers was known already.



Nixon won on the promise of strong law and order in a tightly-controlled ‘run from the Rose Garden’ campaign with no free interplay with journalists and imaging designed to present him as a regular guy. He bowls! He laughs! He plays piano! Does any of this sound remotely familiar? Stephen Harper and his crew learned well.



Ah well, four more years. Be seeing you.

Campaign 2011: After the Gold Rush

Politics for Joe 25


By: Hubert O’Hearn

For: Lake Superior News

May 4, 2011



I was lying in a burned out basement


With the full moon in my eye


I was hoping for replacement


When the sun burst through the sky






There was a band playing in my head


And I felt like getting high,


Thinking about what a friend had said


I was hoping it was a lie


- Neil Young ‘After the Gold Rush’



It seems like an appropriate enough place to start. Neil Young is the greatest songwriter Canada has ever produced. After the Gold Rush, both album and song came out in 1970, with Richard Nixon in the White House and growing divisions splitting generations as military and surveillance needs with accompanying near-paranoid government secrecy conflicted with desires for freedom, peace and social equality.

A leader for our times...


But that was America then and this is Canada now. We’re about to find out if the Opposition warnings about a Conservative ‘hidden agenda’ are true and we’ll have four years worth of evidence to look at by the time the next Federal election rolls around. 1500 days, more or less. I’ve set my alarm.



It would be unfair to sound an alarm. One has to be gracious about the election result - hope for the best and wish the winners well. And I remember Brian Mulroney’s back-to-back majorities. We managed to survive those after a massive job of painful financial restructuring by Jean Chretien and Paul Martin, so we’ll manage to survive four years of Stephen Harper. But I’m not letting my passport expire either.



That last sentence may have gone through Michael Ignatieff’s head during his concession speech Monday night - right after he said that he would stay on as leader as long as he was wanted or needed. You may, if you wish, write your own punchline here.



The NDP deserve congratulations with a stunning 150% increase from their previous high-water mark of 43 seats. Still, 57 members (out of 102) in Quebec will present its own problem. The NDP surge came about after the French-language debate, wherein Jack Layton offered to re-open constitutional talks with Quebec. Has this just been the separatiste vote changing light blue for day-glo orange shirts? One wonders. Regardless, there will be definite pressure on Layton to keep advancing Quebec’s brief which history has taught us does not tend to endear a party - any party - to anglo-Canada.



There will be pressure mounted from certain quarters for an NDP-Liberal merger. I’ve wavered back and forth on this one over the years. There is absolutely no doubt that several of the Liberals’ best programs over the years have come from CCF/NDP ideas - universal health care being the most cited example. But for the nation as a whole I rather hope this dioes not happen. Why?



I referred earlier to a political polarization building in Canada. Just dealing with announced policies, we will be having a right-wing agenda for the next four years: increased defence spending, mega-prisons, monetarist trickle-down economics and shoot ‘em if you got ‘em. The last thing this country needs is an American-style left-right blue state-red state rift. I grant you that I carry a nostalgic affection for the Liberals. But Idon’t let nostalgia run my brain either.



There is a chance that the Liberals may just wither and die, gone with the wind to wherever Social Credit’s ashes blow. They have run three bad campaigns in a row, unable to put together a cogent message and deliver it in an attractive manner to the public. At some level though that is just a problem that can be solved by getting a new advertising guy and a speechwriter. Their core problem is like that of an ageing sports team that one day looks up and realizes that there are no prospects to call up.



I read on-line that Justin Trudeau is likely a serious contender for the Liberal leadership. That is a terrible idea. As I say, I don’t let nostalgia run my brain. A Liberal insider whose opinions I take seriously has the following take: “Real nice guy, but a lightweight.” But I ask you to name three contenders for the leadership. Bob Rae will be too old although he can capably man the fort until a leadership convention a year from now. And if the Liberals still have any sense at all, they will wait at least a year.



Well, enough of all this for now. To apply a little Neil Young symmetry:



Don't let it bring you down


It's only castles burning,


Find someone who's turning


And you will come around.


- Don’t Let it Bring You Down

Jumat, 29 April 2011

Campaign 2011: They Shoot Horses Don't They?





Politics for Joe 24
By: Hubert O'Hearn
For: Lake Superior News

April 28, 2011

I don't know what's going to happen on Monday any more than you or any of the national pollsters. The spread of the three most recently released polls is:

EKOS
CPC: 33.9
NDP: 27.9
LPC: 24.0

Harris-Decima/CP
CPC: 35
NDP: 30
LPC: 22

Nanos/Globe/CTV (three-day rolling average)
CPC: 36.6
NDP: 30.4
LPC: 21.9

EKOS has under-sold the Tories since Day One. It's methodology of random automated calls that do not control for who answers the phone may be causing for a disproportionate number of youth respondents - after all, who answers the phone in your house?

Still, it has been an incredible election and for all I have tut-tutted covering the horse race, it has been a helluva horse race. Pretty much any possible result is still in play, from Tory majority to NDP majority. The Liberal horse has pulled up lame and will be shot at dawn. At that, one has to wonder how deep the commitment of the anti-Harper vote which has perched itself on the NDP branch really is. And at that will the Green vote (somewhere between 4-7% declared) scatter itself over to the NDP?

The three things that I think we safely do know are:

1) The Conservatives will come out of that night with the most seats
2) The Bloc Quebecois will be going the way of the Creditistes. And if
you don't know what that was, that's exactly my point.
2) There will be a sea change of leaders in the next year or two. Gilles
Duceppe will regret not having taken over the PQ when he had the chance. A majority-less Harper will be moved along. And Michael
Ignatieff's horse will be shot at dawn.

Change partners and dance!


Unless the declared vote for the NDP absolutely implodes back into the teens (and I truly can't see it happening) we do have a real shift in Canadian politics. At the very least, from now through all foreseeable future elections the NDP must be seen as true and equal contenders for government formation. The real question will be, will the Liberal Party (Canada) go the way of the Liberal Party (UK)? That has been the dark boogeyman that has lived in the shadows of Liberal bedrooms for years. Once passed by the NDP, could the Liberals ever elbow their way back to the front?

I suspect that we will have the 1985 Ontario result all over again. Harper will get first crack at forming the government, and it still could be a majority. But if the numbers break, ballpark-ishly at:
Conservatives: 130
Reckless Coalition: 180

Under those circumstances I think Harper and the Tories are done for. The Reckless Coalitioners (and someone has to start a band or improv group called Reckless Coalition) will turn the Tory argument around. We can't go back to the polls again because the country needs stability etc. etc.

I do owe the reader an apology. I wanted to write more, but I picked up a couple of writing contracts and money trumps passion when one has bills to pay. But if you're reading this before the polls close, if you haven't voted yet - do. And if you don't, then know your role and shut your mouth because you've lost the right to bitch for the next four years. And what fun is that?

Be seeing you.

Kamis, 28 April 2011

Actress (Part Three)

Inside Television 551
Publication Date: 4-29-11
By: Hubert O'Hearn


Actress Part Three. This is the third and final column in the series on Lisa DiGiacinto. Where we left the story last week, Lisa had left Calgary for the major media production centre of Vancouver. She was leaving on a high, having featured in the stage production of Red Light Winter and been nominated for Best Actress at the Alberta Film and Television Awards for her role in the short film Deadwalkers, available on iTunes.

I've wanted to explain to you the life of the working actress through the story of Lisa's life thus far. What have we established? If I've done my job, you know that she is lovely and talented and ambitious and dedicated and teachable and had established a solid resume in stage, film and radio. So what more do you need? The world's her oyster and pass her the pearl necklace.

Oysters and pearls. A pearl - in case you didn't know or in case you have forgotten - is born of pain. The little oyster is irritated by a grain of sea sand. It hurts. It hurts and the hurt won't go away so the oyster grows this shiny substance that hardens and smooths around the sand hoping it won't hurt any more. We who just see the result thinks the pearl is all prettiness on the half shell. The oyster knows better, but who ever thought to talk to an oyster?

This story called Actress has been in the works for a year now. When I got back in touch Lisa through Facebook I knew that her story was the story every aspiring actor, and every smug audience member who thought that Life is Hard but Acting is Easy needed to know. I asked her last summer what the highs and lows were. She sent me an audio file last August. It was devastating.

We don't have room in a newspaper column to quote from it, so let me summarize the pain. After a year and a half in Vancouver, things were going less than well. Lisa had passed age 30 and that is a dangerous time for an actress. To paraphrase from a play I directed once called Four Dogs and a Bone, and actress gets three lives: Ingenue, Star, and Someone's Maiden Aunt who's dying of cancer. In the ridiculous age standards of Big Entertainment - and they are our standards dear friends, for Hollywood gives us what we ask them - Lisa was in her prime time, but where was primetime?

Worse, one has to exist. The old joke that inside every actor is a waiter is true. Also inside every actor is a receptionist, office temp, booth attendant, all manner of jobs where the employer hires you on the understanding that if you have to book off for an audition - no problem! Then you need the time and that is a problem.

And it can get very, very lonely. Working actors are surrounded by bonhomie - good times! Cheers! But the relationships are temporary and often born of a quiet desperation. No one can ever fault an actor for finally saying 'The hell with it.'

But Lisa never said those words. She has overcome. Cast in the feature film Quiver over the internet on Skype, she returns home to Thunder Bay in a few weeks to begin shooting. And, her present day job hits a sweet spot for an actress. She works for a casting agency in Vancouver. They will surely understand an actor's needs.

How does Lisa DiGiacinto summarize her own story? 'I feel that the universe (all my jobs and the industry) is all finally supporting me and that I am extremely excited to see what the near future has to offer me! I just feel that some major successes are just around the corner.. but I needed to go through the tough times to get to where I am now, it was all part of the journey.'

Irony and pain and talent and excitement. That - that is an Actress.

Be seeing you.

(Thank you for reading and, I hope, sharing. Just to inject a petty commercial note, this site is supported by readers clicking on the ads. HINT. Cheers - H)

Minggu, 24 April 2011

Actress (Part Two)



Inside Television 550
Publication Date: 4-23-11
By: Hubert O'Hearn


Actress Part Two: We continue the story of Lisa Marie DiGiacinto on her ten years' journey leading from Thunder Bay, to Calgary then Vancouver and finally returning back to Thunder Bay to style and profile as the female lead in the feature film Quiver, shooting here in next month.

One of the hard truths of acting that Lisa's story clearly highlights is that no matter how good you might be in Thunder Bay or other hinterland cities, if you want to make it, you have to leave it. Anyone who tries to argue that it is possible to make a living here solely as a creative artist in theatre, film or television either a) has never tried or b) has tried and just hasn't gone broke yet. Small, divided and unsupportive markets will do that to you. Acting is a great hobby in the hinterland; as a profession - no.

The logical place to start for a Canadian actor is Toronto. Lisa looks back today at her fears of Toronto and laughs at them: "There were a few things I was scared of though- the biggest ones being high cost of living and... Apparently I couldn’t drive, apparently no one in Toronto had cars?? WTF, coming from Tbay, I didn’t understand public transit haha." So, as one of her best friends Harmony had moved to Calgary, which was a growth market for entertainment, she moved there in January 2004.

There survival got in the way of her dreams. Having a degree in Commerce, Lisa worked in a bank for two years and it all might have ended there as it ends for many an actor. But, "I was...depressed. (or so I thought)... so I did some self analysis, and came to the conclusion that I wasn’t happy with my path and something had to change, drastically. So, I did some job personality type tests and what was the #1 career choice for me EVERY TIME???? ACTRESS. I knew in my heart that I would never be happy and fulfilled if I didn’t pursue my dreams... the # 2 was broadcasting... so I did both. I started going to acting classes and got a job in promo for a radio station... from there, I started auditioning, and landed my first small one liner role in an indie short called Stolen Horses." But a credit's a credit and a successful actor knows how to build a mansion starting from one brick.

From that one-liner she continued to get work in Calgary, including a part in a picture directed by her teen years heartthrob Jason Priestley. (He was Brandon in the original true classic Beverly Hills 90210.) But just as you can't go anywhere in Thunder Bay, you can only go so far in Calgary. So in December 2008, Lisa gave herself a Christmas present and moved to the production hotbed of Vancouver.

Next week: we bring it all home. Literally. Be seeing you.

Sabtu, 16 April 2011

Campaign Trail 2011: How to Vote for YOU




Politics for Joe 24
By: Hubert O'Hearn


We will absolutely be completing the series on the party platforms. The feedback I've had has been both positive and angrily negative from all sides so therefore we're doing something right. But for now, I want to share with you some thoughts on how to vote.

No, I don't mean that in a candidate or party-specific way. That I think is the trap that Big Media springs on the average voter. The concentration on large, macro patterns such as national or provincial polling; along with large, macro topics such as the relative popularity of the party leaders takes the great national argument away from what its rightful subject. You.


The model voter


Some rather toxic combination of schools, churches and correct parenting drive into us the notion that it is always wrong to be selfish. Have you ever seen the last piece of pie get tossed into the bin because no one in the family wanted to appear so selfish as to take and eat that last wedge of fruit-filled pastry? I swear we as a nation waste tonnes of food per year because we don't want to be appear like greedy little piggies.

Politics and elections are the absolute perfect times to stand up and loudly say, 'What's in it pour moi?' Quebec mastered the art decades ago in the Duplessis era. Everyone from Hull to the Gaspé knew that Le Chiffre was calling a provincial election because the streets and highways smelled of hot, fresh asphalt as the roads were literally paved for another victory. To this day, the Rest of Canada (ROC) tends to get huffy and annoyed with Quebec's quote/enquote 'whining' to get rewards like aerospace contracts, new bridges, hockey rinks, etc. etc. etc. Personally I think it's brilliant on Quebec's part and the ROC should learn from the Bloc.

Here's the theory in a nutshell. If each and every one of us precisely voted our own narrow and selfish interests we should end up with a balanced Parliament that follows the priorities laid out by the electorate. Emphasis on should. I will point out and comment on the flaw in the theory later.

I ask you to take a look at yourself, and/or your own family if you have been so lucky as to have one in your home. What is the one thing that government could possibly do for you that would make your life a little better, a little happier? I urge you not to just reply, 'More money!' as money is a means to an end, not an end to itself regardless of what monetarist Tories will tell you.

(Well you didn't expect me to start getting objective, now did you?)

But if it's more money, it's more money. This is your Letter to Santa, not mine. My priority is Home Care. I have an 85 year old mother living upstairs for whom I get absolutely no help in terms of subsidy or placement in a safer setting. If we ever have a fire - and we did have a house fire four years ago - she will die. Simple as that. Equally, I have a 45 year old beautiful common law wife who is not living in our house because she suffered a brain aneurysm. There are no Neuro-psychologists in Northwestern Ontario (think Oliver Saks) and this is inhibiting her recovery so that she still requires 24 hour supervision. I cannot give that because I have to work, so she must live with her parents in Atikokan, two hours' drive away.

I tell you this personal story because it directly impacts my vote. Which party, which platform, addresses my needs? Both the NDP and Liberals have strong Health Care and Home Care platform planks. So my choice narrows to those two.

Then, what is second on my Santa List? I work at a hotel, therefore it is in my selfish interest to see lots of tourists come to Thunder Bay. Lots of tourists means filled hotel rooms, means profits means a wage increase and more pension money when our next contract comes up. Which platform will do the most for tourism? The Liberals are committed to high-speed rail. Yes, it will first be in the Windsor-Montreal corridor, but at least that's a start and it will likely mean more work for friends who work at teh Bombardier plant here. So, I guess Ken Boshcoff gets my vote.

Are you grasping how this works now? Another example: Let's say you are the parent of a Canadian soldier fighting in Afghanistan. If you want him or her brought home immediately - that's your top priority - you should vote for the NDP candidate in your riding. If you want him or her armed to the teeth, you should vote Tory. The Conservatives are the party most committed to spending at the Department of National Defence.

Essentially then, I am suggesting a three-part process:

1) Assess your priorities
2) Discover who addresses your priorities
3) Vote accordingly

This is why I am plowing through the platforms on your behalf because you have too much life going on to do it for yourself. If all 30,000 or so people who will actually vote in an average riding did just that, the pattern will reflect the riding's majority interests and that riding will elect a man or woman with a mandate to press for those interests.

The flaw - and there is one - is what of minority interests? In some ways all interests are minority interests. Somewhere between 3-7% of the population live with a disability. (The range is because of differing definitions.) There are lots of people who require Home Care, but never a majority. It is for this reason that the economic number that most affects voting is not unemployment, but inflation. Unemployment affects the unemployed. paying more for gas, chicken and toilet paper affects everyone.

This is the big shiny argument for proportional representation (PR). Narrow, minority interests would be represented by narrow, minority interest parties who would in turn build Parliamentary coalitions and work for one another when and where their policy interests matched.

What I've never liked about PR is that I know how the Big Parties will abuse it. They too will receive a certain number of PR seats, so there will actually be Liberal and NDP members in Alberta and so forth. These PR seats are where the Big Parties will place their Star Candidates, so they don't have to get all mucky and actually campaign and get your Uncle Lou his passport on time. And they will wind up leading the party, being the Cabinet members and future leaders; which in turn makes the riding-elected Member of Parliament even less important than s/he is now.

Thanks for reading. More platform columns this week. Please share, tweet and comment. Be seeing you.


Rabu, 13 April 2011

Actress (Part One)




Inside Television 549
Publication Date: 4-15-11
By: Hubert O'Hearn



Lisa Marie DiGiacinto



Actress. I've never understood why the all-encompassing term Actor ever came into use for both men and women. It has to make life awkward for anglophone women named Jean auditioning in Quebec and francophone men finding similar work in Alberta. I find nothing discriminatory about the word actress; therefore I continue to use it.

This and the following two weeks' columns are about one actress. You see, we tend to concentrate on those that have made it, or lost it, or are in the position as producers of media products of making it for others. Life looks easy for them when viewed from a distance: pools and pool parties, more champagne darling, and isn't the beach lovely this time of year?

Yet acting is the hardest work, the hardest career you can pick because talent doesn't necessarily rise like cream or champagne bubbles. Actors and actresses work and scrimp and haul tired bodies into empty theatres lit by one bulb so that they can look fresh and sparkly and just what some shadowy face sat at a table is looking for. Except they aren't looking for someone 5'7 with chestnut hair - no, we really want 5'8 and auburn thank you for coming leave your pictures at the desk.

I'd like to introduce you to a friend of mine that I haven't seen in more than ten years who is right there, right at that moment when the hundredth key has been placed in the lock and turned and - lo and behold - it clicked. She is about to become one of the exalted ones. May we have a round of applause for Lisa DiGiacinto.

Lisa has just secured her first major role, the female lead in Quiver; a feature film that begins shooting in Thunder Bay next month. Lisa is from Thunder Bay originally and it is a splendid irony that she moved first to Calgary and then Vancouver to receive her break in Thunder Bay. But that's acting for you. If you don't have a sense of irony going in, don't worry, it will seek you out.

I want to take you on the path Lisa followed to where she is today. I first met her in 1999. For a very brief time, there was a theatre production group at Lakehead University, where Lisa was a student. I know that theatre group well because I headed it. Dr. Fred Gilbert, the President of LU was kind enough to give me a desk in the basement of the Agora and we put on one show, Anton Chekhov's The Seagull. There was no funding, so it all drifted apart like the mists of a Russian dawn, but for a few minutes it was brilliant.

Lisa played Nina, the female lead. She was twenty then, very pretty and equally unpolished but you could see that she really - really - wanted to act. I remember during rehearsal she broke into tears behind the curtain on the stage right side of the Bora Laskin Auditorium, next to a giant clanking lighting board that looked like a set piece from Wolfgang Petersen's film Das Boot. I don't remember now what I said, but it must have worked.

On opening night she gave a performance that is - yes - my favourite of 105 opening nights I have attended as actor or director or writer. Lisa electrified. In the closing mad scene she was consumed and consumed and fed the audience with all the shock and perfect horror of her character. She became an Actress in that moment.

I wondered over the intervening decade what had become of her, knowing in my heart that if she pursued it, she might breathe the rare air of stardom. Thanks to Facebook, we re-connected.

Next week: Packing, Pubs and Parts - the story continues.